It has been
a topic of major concern for everybody, mothers, fathers, clergymen and
pastors. What exactly does the word of God say about women wearing trousers?
“ A woman shall not wear a man’s
garment, nor shall a man put on a woman’s cloak, for whoever does these things
is an abomination to the LORD your God.”
Now this has
been well said. Shall we then try to analyze and be very objective at
discerning these things. Yes, we can’t deny the fact that divine order has been
given to humans so as to help differentiate sexes by mere sight. The burning
desires most girls have these days especially when it concerns what they wear,
is waxing fast. Many Christians still
speak vehemently against trousers as though it was what God personally had in
mind when he told the Israelites what to wear and what not to wear. I am not sure
though, but just maybe it might be trousers He had in mind when he said that,
you(the reader) can still let us know. Its even very surprising that Moses
didn’t even know what trousers was then. You know why? Both men and women wore
flowing robe. And how did I know? Pictures of people in the bible assigned
these holy characters those robes. Exactly! Now the question is, if men and
women of the Moses’s era wore robes, how
were they able to differentiate which robe was male’s and which was female’s.
sure, I think you would need time to process that in your mind
The truth
is, our traditions and cultures are very different and we have different outfit in different tribes. Some European men especially Scottish men
still wear skirts till date. Some roman soldiers still wear the skirt like war robe , the priests of all orthodox
churches are still wearing gown too. Are these men to be indicted for flouting
the rules of God? Well, I don’t think so. The culture of Indians already
afforded their women trousers, and as
they are now Christians, would they pack their style of trousers and fling over
to their men to wear? Lets think about it. We, Africans, had no proper
clothing, the white men came with their clothes and we began wearing them. It
is only sensible that as the trend is improving we imbibe the changes made,
especially when we are sure it won’t mar our decency.
Some
puritans would say trousers are untraditional. It is western. Sure it is
western. But then what exactly do we wear that isn’t western? So I am sure they
would prefer when these ladies would parade the street half naked, wearing only
the skimpy wrappers draped around their waist, with the beautiful ure designs on their skin and the jigida worn around their waist. That is so
uniquely African. Or don’t you think so?
Then again
if you are looking at buba and ukwu George as the African indigenous wears,
then I hate to break it to you. We still copied these styles from the white
people too and even with the cotton material that were imported during the
trans Saharan and trans-Atlantic trades of the fourteenth and fifteenth
centuries
So, ladies
wear ladies’ trousers. I am inclined to believe that such trousers when worn by
any guy would burst one’s belly with unquenchable laughter. Wouldn’t it be easier to differentiate a
guy’s trousers and a lady’s own than to differentiate between gown worn by men
and women of the olden times. Let us
ponder over this and think carefully before we come screaming stridently in the
early morning that women who wear trousers should repent. These days, skirts
are becoming styled in very seductive ways that men would easily ogle women wearing them (the tight fitted short
skirt, the long gown with obscene slit ) rather than women who wear decent
trousers. Of course trousers can be indecent too depending on the features. It
boils down to the motive for wearing what you wear. Do you wear to seduce or
you wear to cover?
I have heard
some women say they feel more covered wearing trousers than skirts. These women still look very decent wearing
trousers. So now I would like to ask .
What exactly
should we preach? Should we preach against trousers or against gross indecency?
Comments
Post a Comment